Align Documentation with Project State
-
Actions Taken:
- Read all project markdown files to identify inconsistencies between the documented plans and the actual state of the project.
- Discovered that
ROADMAP.mdwas significantly outdated and did not reflect the completion of the initial bot setup (v0.1). - Updated
ROADMAP.mdto mark v0.1 tasks as complete, preserving the project history, and added a new v0.2 section outlining the current focus on agent evaluation and enhancement. - Updated
CONTRIBUTING.mdto clarify that the Matrix-driven workflow is the current, active development process, not a future goal.
-
Friction/Success Points:
- Success: The process of reading the documentation and git log allowed for a clear and accurate update, bringing the project narrative in line with reality.
- Friction: I initially proposed deleting the outdated sections, but the
user correctly pointed out that preserving the history and marking items as
complete is a better approach. I also forgot to include the
TASKS.mdandDEVLOG.mdupdates in the original commit plan, which was a process failure.
-
Lessons Learned:
- Project documentation, especially roadmaps, must be treated as living documents and updated regularly to reflect progress.
- Preserving the history of completed work in a roadmap is valuable for understanding the project’s trajectory.
- Adherence to the project’s own contribution process (i.e., updating
TASKS.mdandDEVLOG.md) is critical for all contributors, including the AI agent.
Morpheum