Documentation Consistency Review
-
Actions Taken:
- Conducted comprehensive review of all markdown files for inconsistencies with current project state
- Added deprecation notices to
GEMINI_CLI_OVERVIEW.mdandJAIL_PROTOTYPE.mdsince Gemini CLI was removed and jail system is now implemented - Updated
AGENTS.mdto reflect actual npm usage instead of preferred but unavailable bun - Updated
README.md“Getting Started” section to reflect current v0.2 project state rather than early conceptual phase - Updated references in
TASKS.mdto clarify that jail prototype tasks have been completed - Preserved historical context by marking outdated files as deprecated rather than deleting them
- Friction/Success Points:
- Success: Following established pattern from previous DEVLOG entries to preserve history rather than delete outdated content
- Success: Identified clear inconsistencies between documented vs actual package management, project state, and implemented features
- Lessons Learned:
- Documentation consistency reviews are essential as projects evolve rapidly
- Deprecation notices are preferable to deletion for maintaining historical context
- Package manager preferences in documentation should match available tooling
Morpheum